Never mind, I'll find someone like you, I wish nothing but the best for you too

I heard that you're settled down
That you found a girl and you're married now.
I heard that your dreams came true.
Guess she gave you things I didn't give to you.

Old friend, why are you so shy?
Ain't like you to hold back or hide from the light.

I hate to turn up out of the blue uninvited
But I couldn't stay away, I couldn't fight it.
I had hoped you'd see my face and that you'd be reminded
That for me it isn't over.

Never mind, I'll find someone like you
I wish nothing but the best for you too
Don't forget me, I beg
I remember you said,
"Sometimes it lasts in love but sometimes it hurts instead,
Sometimes it lasts in love but sometimes it hurts instead, "
Yeah

You know how the time flies
Only yesterday was the time of our lives
Bound by the surprise of our glory days

I hate to turn up out of the blue uninvited
But I couldn't stay away, I couldn't fight it.
I'd hoped you'd see my face and that you'd be reminded
That for me it isn't over.

Never mind, I'll find someone like you
I wish nothing but the best for you too
Don't forget me, I beg
I remember you said,
"Sometimes it lasts in love but sometimes it hurts instead."
Yeah

Nothing compares
No worries or cares
Regrets and mistakes
They are memories made.
Who would have known how bittersweet this would taste?

Never mind, I'll find someone like you
I wish nothing but the best for you
Don't forget me, I beg
I remember you said,
"Sometimes it lasts in love but sometimes it hurts instead."

Never mind, I'll find someone like you
I wish nothing but the best for you too
Don't forget me, I beg
I remember you said,
"Sometimes it lasts in love but sometimes it hurts instead,
Sometimes it lasts in love but sometimes it hurts instead.

- Adele

I'm not a princess, this ain't a fairy tale

I honestly believed in you
Holding on
The days drag on
Stupid girl,
I should have known, I should have known


I'm not a princess, this ain't a fairy tale,
I'm not the one you'll sweep off her feet,
Lead her up the stairwell
This ain't Hollywood, this is a small town,
I was a dreamer before you went and let me down,
Now it's too late for you and your white horse to come around

Baby I was naive,
Got lost in your eyes
And never really had a chance
My mistake, I didn't know to be in love
You had to fight to have the upper hand
I had so many dreams
About you and me
Happy endings
Now I know


I'm not a princess, this ain't a fairy tale,
I'm not the one you'll sweep off her feet,
Lead her up the stairwell
This ain't Hollywood, this is a small town,
I was a dreamer before you went and let me down,
Now it's too late for you and your white horse to come around


Cause I'm not your princess, this ain't a fairytale,
I'm gonna find someone someday who might actually treat me well
This is a big world, that was a small town
There in my rear view mirror disappearing now
And it's too late for you and your white horse
Now it's too late for you and your white horse to catch me now


Try and catch me now
Oh, it's too late
To catch me now

- Taylor Swift

When you 're seventeen

when you're seventeen and somebody tells you they love you,
You're gonna believe them

When you're seventeen and your first kiss
Makes your head spin 'round

But in your life you'll do things greater than
Dating that boy
But I didn't know it at seventeen.

when you're seventeen , When all you wanted was to be wanted
Wish you could go back and tell yourself what you know now


And when you're seventeen, don't forget to look before you fall
I've found time can heal most anything
And you just might find who you're supposed to be
I didn't know who I was supposed to be at seventeen :(

Must Read - True Story to Share - Power of Sadka and Khairat

True Story to Share - Power of Sadka and Khairat We think what we earn is because of our own capabilities. This story tells you that if you hold your hand and spending for Sadqa and Khairat, how troubles will hit you from no where.

Salman Rushdie and Freedom of Expression

If they are for absolute freedom of expression let them first fight for it in the western democracies and let Mr. Rushdie write a book questioning Holocaust and other Jewish and Christian beliefs. I am sure he will not find a publisher and will be hounded by the Zionist lobby as former US president Jimmy Carter and Tushar Gandhi were in America for merely suggesting that the Palestinians have been wronged.

By Shahid Siddiqui, The Milli Gazette

Published Online: Feb 08, 2012

I would like to ask one fundamental question to all the friends, supporters and admirers of Salman Rushdie "Is the right to speech or expression absolute without any restrictions in any democratic society of the world?" The right to freedom of expression is recognized as a human right under article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) states that "everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kind, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of choice". Article 19 goes on to say that the exercise of this right carries "special duties and responsibilities" and may "therefore be subject to certain restrictions" when necessary "for respect of the rights or reputation of others, or for the protection of national security or public order, or of public health or morals". Under all the democratic constitutions of the world this right is commonly subject to limitations, such as libel, slander, obscenity, incitement to commit violence or a crime. Hate speech against any group, community, race, religion or colour is a crime in any free and democratic society of the world.

Those who read excerpts from banned Satanic Verses did not once condemn or question the right of Mr. Rushdie to abuse or insult a religion and its beliefs and religious personalities. Wouldn't it have been in the order of things if these great champions of freedom of absolute and unfettered freedom of expression also had condemned Mr. Rushdie for hurting the sentiments of millions of people around the world.

The argument is that the book is banned but not the writer. The writer has committed the crime of hate and abusive speech but his freedom of movement cannot be restricted. Did Mr. Rushdie and his friends who are questioning Indian democracy, raise their voice when a renowned Indian Islamic preacher Zakir Naik was banned from entering Britain in June 2010 and latter banned by US. The argument of the British Home secretary was that he was being excluded because his repeated comments justifying "terror, when faced with terror" was evidence enough of his "unacceptable behavior". Dr. Naik was invited by a number of British organizations to deliver lectures on "Islam and peace". The Home secretary said coming to UK is a privilege not a right, and I am not willing to allow those who might not be conducive to the public good to enter the UK." This is not an isolated case, hundreds of people with valid documents are stopped from entering these great democracies and their right to free speech and movement are curtailed without any reason, based on whims and fancies of some bigoted bureaucrats. Islamophobia has become so prevalent in these Western Democracies that sometime the mere name is reason enough to stop individuals from entering these countries even when they hold valid documents and invitations. Would those who say that by protesting against the participation of Mr. Rushdie people have committed a sacrilege against the very idea of freedom of expression, stand up for the people against whom this crime is committed every day in their beloved democracies?

I am no apologist for Dr. Naik or those who hold such beliefs as I am not for Mr. Rushdie's absolute right to insult humiliate and abuse in the name of creative freedom. Democratic governments put restrictions on those they think may create some problem if they are allowed to enter the country. However nobody should assert that by doing so these governments are putting democracy in peril as Salman Rushdie claimed in his interview with an Indian t v channel.

People argue that the freedom to criticize and question is fundamental to human conscience and freedom of expression. I am totally in support of this idea. There are hundreds of books critical of Islam, the Holy Prophet or Quran. Some of these writings are offensive and full of misleading or distorted facts. But there has never been any global public outcry against these books. One can always reply to criticism by writing another book to counter such propaganda, but how do you reply to pure abusive and vulgar writing and imagery? Books and articles have been written in the last twenty years in reply to Rushdie's Satanic Verses but for the common man, who is not a scholar, this remains a very emotive issue. The very title of the book Satanic Verses is offensive but we may overlook this in the light of an incident which in the eyes of some scholars took place in the life of the Prophet.

According to Islamic Studies scholar Anthony McRoy, what Muslims find blasphemous is the name "Mahound", a derogatory term for Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) used during the Crusades and which means the lowest creature from the depth of hell. In fact the most offensive part of the book are the abusive words in Hindi (gaali), freely used against Mahound by Gabriel Farishta, who was a Bollywood film star turned into an angel. Holy Mecca is depicted (god forbid) as a brothel staffed by prostitutes who take the names of Prophets wives, with Hazrat Omar the close companion of the prophet as the brothel keeper. Saladin the great Egyptian ruler, who defeated the Crusaders, is depicted as a devil or shaitan. Even the crusaders had nothing but praise for Saladin. Rushdie's writings are so offensive that they cannot be quoted in any responsible and respectable magazine or newspaper. The result is that not only those who oppose him, but even those who support him, have either not read or understood the context in which Rushdie is creating his magic realism and it's not so fictitious characters.

I was one those few persons who was offered the manuscript of the book before its publication by Penguin India to offer my comments as the publishers themselves were doubtful of the impact book will create in India. I recommended to the publishers that the book should not come to India as the communal situation at that point (1988) was not conducive to such writings due to the Babri Masjid controversy. Emotions were already inflamed and the book could be used by communalists on both sides of the divide to exploits passions and sentiments. The book was banned quietly by the government avoiding much controversy or protests from Indian Muslims. It is the fatwa by the Iranian spiritual leader Ayatollah Khomeini which led to global protest and the larger controversy. Even then majority of Muslims opposed the fatwa. Indian Muslims at no point supported the idea of killing Rushdie.

However, the Western world, which was desperately looking for a convenient target after the decline of Soviet Union, picked up the chant to protect Rushdie and demonize Islam, Muslims and their governments. They spent millions of dollars not only for the sake of "right to freedom of expression" but to use this issue to garner political support to isolate Iran and justify their Islamophobia. Is it a co-incidence that the Satanic Verses unleashed the anti-Islam propaganda, which has lead to many unjustified wars, killing of millions of innocent people and demonizing a whole religion and its 1500 million believers around the world.

Even those who stood up for the right of Rushdie to come to the Jaipur Literary Festival agreed that those opposed to him had the democratic right to protest peacefully against his visit. Darul-Uloom Deoband said that if he apologises and edits the offensive portions from his book we will withdraw our opposition to him.

Votaries of freedom of expression will outright reject such an idea as a threat to this fundamental freedom. However, same Salman Rushdie and his publishers took no time in apologizing to Mrs. Indira Gandhi and editing the offensive portions from "The Midnight Children". At that point he and his publishers did not take the moral high ground of absolute, unrestricted right to creative freedom. Is it because her lawyers had filed a libel case in British courts and they may have had to pay huge amount for this offence? The same people made huge amount of money from the controversy and turned the abusive writer into a hero, celebrity and a millionaire. Many British writers and a section of the media at that time alleged that the publishers stoked the fires of anguish and anger to exploit the controversy. Rushdie has always thrived on controversies and insults to known public figures of the sub continent. In his book "Shame" he made fun of all Pakistani leaders from Z. A. Bhutto to Ziaul haq. He has a right to do so but what offended my sensibilities was his depiction of Zia's mentally challenged daughter Zain as a vampire which roams the streets of Pakistani cities at night and sucks the blood of innocent people. Portraying an innocent, and helpless challenged child as a vampire may be regarded as the height of literary genius by the admirers of Rushdie but in my opinion it is in extremely bad taste and should be condemned by all those who stand for the rights of differently-abled people.

If Rushdie had written the same things against Jesus Christ which he wrote against the Prophet he would have been prosecuted under the British blasphemy law which were partisan in nature and under them maximum punishment was death sentence. The law was abandoned by the British parliament in May 2008. However, at the time of the controversy in 1988, Rushdie took refuge in England to save himself from prosecution by arguing that he had not offended Jesus Christ, Bible or basic tenants of Christianity and therefore blasphemy law is not applicable to him.

Denying or questioning the holocaust is a crime in most of the European democracies. Many countries have broader laws that criminalize genocide denial. Michael Whine argues that Holocaust denial can inspire violence against Jews. Many prominent historians like Raul Hilberg, Richard J Evens, Noam Chomsky, Peter Singer and Christopher Hitchens have regarded these laws as limiting the freedom to investigate research and write. In fact many writers and journalists have either been prosecuted or hounded out of their countries of birth, even for suggesting that the claims about Holocaust may not be entirely true. I hope those who are questioning Indian Democracy and its inability to protect Rushdie will ponder over some of these restrictions and denial of the freedom of expression. Many books in U.S. are banned or edited for exposing the games played by CIA, in the name of national security. The list of books banned in some of these democracies is so long that it will take a book to list and describe them.

I don't deny the right of people to eulogies Rushdie and regard his writings as litmus test for the protection of right to speech. In India we Hindus Muslims and believers of all faiths have lived together for thousands of years. In thousand years of Muslims presence in India we do not come across any writing abusive of Hindu gods and religious figures by any prominent writer or a poet. We do read the poems of Ras Khan in Brijbhasha eulogizing Lord Krishna, or Abdul Rahim Khankhana translating Ramayna and Mahabharat in Persian. A book can be written on the contribution of Muslim scholars and poets in propagating and appreciating Hindu gods, goddesses and religious books. In India there is hardly any example of writings by Hindu or Sikh writers critical of the Prophet or the basic tenants of Islam. I would therefore request the supporters of Rushdie not to impose their idea of freedom on Indian society. If they are for absolute freedom of expression let them first fight for it in the western democracies and let Mr. Rushdie write a book questioning Holocaust and other Jewish and Christian beliefs. I am sure he will not find a publisher and will be hounded by the Zionist lobby as former US president Jimmy Carter and Tushar Gandhi were in America for merely suggesting that the Palestinians have been wronged. Indian intelligentsia will do well to ponder over these issues dispassionately and not be swayed by Rushdie-ism and votaries of unfettered freedom of expression.

The writer is editor of Nai Duniya Urdu weekly

--
Aish - The Fairy Princess

Visit my Blog - 

http://cutheartprincessash.blogspot.com/

“ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS BUT ALL TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIMS IS A MYTH OR A MEDIA HYPE”

BISMILLAHIRRAHMANIRRAHEEM

MAIN RONA APNA ROTA HUN, WO HAS HAS KE SUNTE HAIN,

UNHE DIL KI LAGI EK DILLAGI MALOOM HOTI HAI…

ASSALAMU ALAIKUM WARAHMATULLAHI WABARAKATUH YA IKHWANUL MUSLIMEEN…

"ALL MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS BUT ALL TERRORISTS ARE MUSLIMS IS A MYTH OR A MEDIA HYPE"

HOW MANY ARE THESE MUSLIMS?

The Great Ashoka: In a war of KALINGA, alone killed more than 1,00,000 people. He was a Hindu. Muslim???

Maximilin Robespierre: During French revolution starved and tortured around 2,00,000 people and Executed 40,000 people. Muslim???

Benito Mussolini of Italy: In his time killed 4,00,000 people. Muslim???

Mao Tse Tsung of China: In his time killed 14 to 20 millions or human being. Was he Muslim????

Adolf Hitler of Germany: Incinerated 6 million Jews. Was he Muslim?

Joseph Stalin (Uncle Joe): Killed 20 million of human beings including 14.5 millions were starved to death. Was he muslim???? ??? ???

Saddam Hussain killed few 100 thousands people in his time but the embargo put by the George Bush and USA alone killed more than half million of Iraqi CHILDREN.

COULD THESE ACTS LABLED AS TERRORISAM…??

My Doubts are very few and minimal. Please read below:

Dropping of H Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The millions of civilians were killed and still defective babies are being born.

Iraq invaded on false charges of WMD and Al-Qaeda and a million killed in the process.

US and UN embargo killed half a millions Iraqi children.

Asking for Usama bin Laden from Taliban without any proof UNO attacked on Afghanistan and killed millions of Muslims and it is still going on.

Where as next door a tiny terrorist state named Israel has a stock pile of hundreds of WMD! Any UN resolution against it vetoed y US!!! It has kicked UN resolution in dozen and no action!

Radio active amour piecing shells used by US forces in Iraq which will spread cancer and tumor in Iraq for hundreds of years to come!

State sponsored Gujrat Carnage!

Ghaza seize and non-stop bombardment and phosphorus bombing.

For last fifty plus years Palestinians driven our of their homes forcefully. Their children women killed. Women raped in public by Israel militants. Stone throwing kids arrested and tortured to death.

Let's see where Islam stands on the subject – Terrorism:

This profession is never a Muslim Monopoly. Not even a Muslims specialty!

Muslims believe in Quran which says:

"You killed a single innocent human being you killed the whole humanity!!! If you save a single innocent human being you saved the whole mankind."

Terrorism is strictly prohibited in Islam.

At the same time Freedom Fighters temporarily called terrorists. E.g. British called Neta Ji Subhash Chandra Bose, Bhagat Singh, Bagha Jatin, Chandra Shekhar Azad, Raj Guru, Ashfaq Ullah Khan as terrorists! Once George Washington called terrorists. Today Palestinians whose land is stolen, children killed, women raped if they resist with stones they are called terrorists and butchered using US supplied weapons!!

LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THE RECORDS OF TERRORISM AROUND THE WORLD:

19th Century no attack by Muslims. Suddenly after forceful creation of Israel on Muslim land and Zionist media bashing of Muslims attacks started by freedom fighters of Palestine.

LETS SEE WHAT HAPPENED TILL NINETEENTH CENTUARY.

13th March 1881 in the streets of St. Petersburg Tsar Alexander – II of Russia was traveling in a bullet proof car. An anarchist set off a bomb which killed 21 by standards. When the Tsar stepped our of car; next bomb killed him.

In 1886 a Bomb blast took place Haymarket in Chicago during a labor rally. 8 anarchists were involved. All non-muslims. Dozens killed in that violence.

6th September, 1901 US President William McKinley was assassinated. He was shot twice by an anarchist Leon Czolgosz an anarchist a non-muslim.

1st of October Bomb blast done by two Christians James and Joseph.

28th June 1914 Archduke of Austria and his wife assassinated by members of young Bosnia who were Non-Muslim Serbs. This incidence lead to world war.

16th April 1925 bomb blast in St. Nedeliya Church; Sofia: Bulgaria was done by communists who were not Muslims.

9th October, 1934 King Alexander – I of Yugoslavia was assassinated by a gunman.

1st May 1961 the first US air craft was hijacked to Cuba by Ramirez Oriz a Non-Mulim.

28th August 1968 the US Ambassador to Guatemala was assassinated by a Non-Muslim.

30th July 1969 US Ambassador to Japan was knifed by a Japanese.

3rd September 1969 US Ambassador to Brazil was kidnapped by a Non-Muslim.

19th April 1995 Federal Building was bombed in Oklahoma city by two Christians Timothy and Terry. 166 killed and hundreds injured.

From 1941 to 1948 in total 259 severally violent terrorists attacks were committed by Jewish Terrorists.

22nd July 1946 bombing of King David Hotel was done by Menachem Begin. His team of gangsters was dressed as Arabs to pass the blame to Palestinians. 91 innocent killed. UK declared him as the deadliest terrorist. He became the Prime Minister of Israel and finally received Nobel Prize for Peace.

That shows the power of media. It can change the opinion in any direction.

When Muslims will realize that? They are busy in buildings worlds tallest towers; expensive hotels, palaces never building media.

Ariel Sharon the bulldozer the terrorist of Sabra and Shatiala was called Man of Peace by a number of US Presidents!

Creation of Israel itself at gun point is the biggest act of terror. Before 1945 Israel was no where in the world map! The original children of the land now landless. If they fight (with stones) to get back their land whole Zionist owned media portray them as terrorists and Israel state forces use all kind of latest weaponry gifted by US!

In Germany from 1968 to 1992 Baader Meinhoff Gang killed several innocent people, they were Christians.

In Italy Red Brigade kidnapped Aldo More former Prime Minister of Italy and killed several innocent human beings.

20th March 1996 Aum Shirkyo A Buddhist cult used nerve gas in a Tokyo subway.

In UK since hundred years IRA has been conducting worst possible violent terrorist acts. Where as a handful of muslims who reacted to British participation to unjust Iraq war, immediately British British media called it Islamic terrorism. Tony Blair found Muslims are the worst danger to UK. In 100 year of violence IRA was never called as Christian or Catholic terrorists.

1972 IRA conducted three bomb blast.

1974 IRA bombed Gulf Ford Pub.

1972 IRA bombed Birmingham Pub Killed 21 and injured 182.

1996 London Bombing by IRA killed 2 injured more than 100.

1996 IRA Manchester Shopping Centre 200 injured.

IRA planted 500 pound car bomb 35 people injured.

15th August 1998 one 500 Pound car bomb killed dozens. 4th March bombed by IRA.

TONY BLAIR is more afraid of "MUSLIM TERRORISTS" than IRA who is conducting Terrorist attacks for more than a hundred years.

In Spain & France ETA conducted 36 major terrorists' attacks.

Lords Salvation Army of Uganda is the most dreaded terror organization of Africa. They have wipe out a lot of people from that continent.

LTTE most Innovative and specialized in suicide bombing and cyanide capsules! Now dreaming of Maha Elam spreading from Sri Lanka to Tamil Nadu!

Sikhs had their Khalistan Movement; until ruthlessly suppressed by Indian Army and Punjab Police.

31st October 1984 Indian serving Prime Minister was assassinated by her two Sikh bodyguard who were definitely not muslims.

There is not a single Muslims in ATTF (All Tripura Tiger Force) who strikes terror since ages in the North East. All Christians.

National Liberation Front of Tripura has no Muslim in their ranks. All Christians.

2nd October, 2004; Christian terrorists killed 44 Hindus.

ULFA had committed 1990 to 2006 in 16 years 740 numbers of violent terrorist acts. They are all Hindus. Their list of effective and successful attacks will put Kashmiri militants at shame!

Maoist in Nepal committed 99 acts of terror in Nepal in seven years time.

Out of 600 districts of India Maoists are active in 150 with all latest weaponry and are on a killing spree. How many muslims are among their ranks???? NIL, NO ONE calls them Hindus terrorists. More killing done by Maoists than years of violence by Kashmiries.

STILL GOVT. OF INDIA AND ALL THINK THAT MUSLIMS ARE TERRORIRTS DANGER FOR THE WORLD???? WHY? BECOZ OF AMERICA SAY SO?

GIVE YOUR OPENION ON THIS THAT WHY THEY THINK SO??????

JAZAKALLAHU KHAIRAN KASEERAN KASEERAH.

--
Aish - The Fairy Princess

Visit my Blog - 

http://cutheartprincessash.blogspot.com/

What happens when you Quit Smoking ( For urdu readers )

--
Aish - The Fairy Princess

Visit my Blog - 

http://cutheartprincessash.blogspot.com/

All Muslims are terrorist...O Really!!!

Who started the first world war ?
Muslims ?

Who started the second world war ?
Muslims ?

Who killed about 20 millions of
Aborigines in Australia ?
Muslims??

Who sent the nuclear bombs of Hiroshima
and Nakazaki ?
Muslims??

Who killed more than 100 millions of
Indians in North America ?
Muslims ??

Who killed more than 50 millions of
Indians in south America ??
Muslims ??

Who took about 180 millions of African
people as slaves and 88% of them died
and was thrown in Atlantic ocean ?
Muslims ??

Who killed 6 million Jews in Germany?
Muslims??

No, Not at all, They weren't Muslims …… So gets your facts right!!!

Dont spread what u hear just go in history then you will get who is Terrorists...

JAZAKALLAHU FIDDARAIN...

Celebrating Eid Meelad al-nabi (the birthday of the Prophet) is not proved by Hadith and Quran

(Fatwa: 414/339/B=1431)

 

Celebrating Eid Meelad al-nabi (the birthday of the Prophet) is not proved by Hadith and Quran. The companions of the holy Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) who held great respect and love for holy Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم), they never celebrated Eid Meelad. It is the invention of Christians which was invented following six hundred years after the holy Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم). We are not asked to celebrate the birthday or death-day of anyone. This day should be spent like other days.

Allah (Subhana Wa Ta'ala) knows Best

Darul Ifta,
Darul Uloom Deoband India

Source - http://darulifta-deoband.org/showuserview.do?function=answerView&all=en&id=20428

Types of Rozay daars

 

Posted by alizafar on Aug 15, 2010 

Type A ;

This type of Rozay dar has the following characteristics

1)   He makes sure to stuff himself with parathas and lasees (may be food suppliments) during sehry to prevent hunger from putting him in any kind of pain or misery the next day which can accidently lead him to test himself or provide an opportunity to relook at his desires and change for better.

2)   Since now he has kept the Roza, he would go around asking everyone if they have kept it or not. Hoping someone would say "no" in embarrassment and he will rise to the occasion as a better Muslim in his own eyes and give a monstrous, demeaning look to the non-rozay dar.

3)   He waits for aftary to feast on pakoras and other unhealthy fried food but more than that…… his cigarette.

4)   During his day, he displays occasional bursts of impatient and intolerant behavior at home and at workplace but mostly on the street in traffic, making the lives of the people around him hell with the horn!

5)   He feels confident that he has "pleased" God with this "selfless" act and may continue with his wrong doings throughout the year. Of course he feels next year  same month he can again "please" Him by completing his full set of Rozaz and will again be forgiven for all the times he has cheated and hurt people.

Type B :

1)   He is a silent rozaydaar  who keeps such matters confined to himself and God.

2)   He does not give a look of pity to other non rozay daars neither does he think that the whole world would go to hell except him and those who are fasting.

3)   He is simple and affectionate and predominantly humble.

4)   Kids love him.

5)   He keeps his sehri and aftari healthy and simple and prevents stuffing.

6)   He stops his children to boo away other children in school who are not fasting.

7)   He is honest in his dealing with or without a roza, during ramadan and after ramadan.

8)   He does not wait for Ramadan to finish so that he can get back to his lecherous lifestyle . He likes to maintain that balance of good  and evil through out the year.

Type C :

1)   This is the guy you would find claiming his superiority over all other sects and religions since he is a muslim and spend hours on internet forums demonizing, offending and abusing other people and religions.

2)   During Ramadan he blesses himself further by doubling his rounds of the shops and markets to check out women and  girls. He harasss them in kindness and follows them to their houses in an attempt to pass his numbers for late night delights instead of wasting time watching porn.

3)   You will also find him using cuss words loudly in public places after aftari while smoking a joint and planning his fights with the other gangs the next day. Who can stop him for making it into heaven since " yeh to saaray rozay rakhta hai! Pooray 30 !"

Type D :

1)   Nothing much to be said about this one. He wakes up till sehry and goes to sleep after that. Wakes up 10 minutes before aftary. Feeds on fruit chart etc. Pretty harmless.

Type E :

If you are not any of the above then this is you!

--
Aish - The Fairy Princess

Visit my Blog - 

http://cutheartprincessash.blogspot.com/